.svg)
Applitools is a leading visual testing platform that brings AI-powered automation to UI validation. It's one of the industry leaders in the visual testing niche:
- Applitools uses a proprietary Visual AI that detects perceptible differences between baseline and current screenshots. This means fewer false positives, since the engine focuses on changes a human user would actually notice, like layout shifts or font rendering issues, and ignores noise like anti-aliasing or dynamic elements.
-
It works with Selenium, Cypress, Playwright, Appium, WebdriverIO, and many others. You can test across browsers, devices, and screen resolutions with a single line of code.
-
Applitools maintains a baseline for each test case and handles versioning, environment diffs, and branching out of the box.
With that said, like any other specialized tool, Applitools is not always the best fit for all teams:
-
Cost Structure Doesn’t Fit Everyone: Applitools' pricing is opaque and leans toward enterprise-scale budgets. There are startup-friendly packages, but costs quickly add up when scaling parallel tests.
- Closed ecosystem & Proprietary stack: Unlike open-source tools, Applitools doesn’t expose the inner workings of its AI or visual comparison engine. This black-box approach limits customization or debugging beyond what the dashboard allows.
- Heavy Emphasis on Visuals Only: It’s a best-in-class visual validation tool, but it doesn't offer built-in support for functional, performance, or accessibility testing. That makes it more like an add-on, not a standalone test suite, which some teams prefer to avoid.
How to choose an Applitools alternatives?
When exploring Applitools alternatives, think about what you really want in your testing tool arsenal.
- For pixel-perfect visual comparison: tools like Percy and Screener.io offer simpler diffing pipelines, though they rely on pixel comparisons instead of AI, making them more prone to false positives in dynamic UIs.
- For open-source and self-hosted control: BackstopJS and Loki provide full control over test orchestration, versioning, and baseline images, ideal for engineering-heavy teams who want to avoid vendor lock-in.
- For fast feedback in CI pipelines: tools like Chromatic (for Storybook components) or Percy (with parallelization support) are optimized for integration into GitHub Actions or GitLab CI, especially when visual reviews are part of the PR flow.
- For cost-sensitive teams: Look at alternatives like Resemble.js or Pixelmatch with Puppeteer. They’re lightweight, highly customizable, and free, though they require more engineering to scale.
Top 12 Applitools alternatives for 2026
Here are 12 Applitools alternatives that we're going to introduce in this article:
| Tool | Description |
|---|---|
| Katalon Platform | Unified low-code automation framework for web, API, desktop, and mobile testing, enhanced with AI-driven test creation and maintenance features. |
| Percy | Visual testing solution that integrates with CI/CD pipelines and captures screenshots across environments with pixel diffing and Git-based review workflows. |
| BackstopJS | Open-source visual regression framework using headless Chrome and custom scenarios; ideal for teams that want full control over visual testing infrastructure. |
| Loki | Visual testing for Storybook and React components, designed for UI component validation at the design system level. |
| Screener | Cloud-based visual testing tool that integrates with Storybook and popular CI tools, using pixel diffing and cross-browser rendering on their proprietary grid. |
| Mabl | Low-code test automation platform for web and mobile apps with AI-powered self-healing, visual validation, and deep CI/CD integration. |
| Testim | AI-enhanced low-code test automation for web apps with strong visual validation, version control, and JavaScript extensibility for advanced workflows. |
| Ghost Inspector | Cloud-based, no-code test recorder for browser automation with screenshot comparisons, test scheduling, and alerts for visual changes. |
| Chromatic | Visual regression testing platform tightly integrated with Storybook, ideal for frontend teams validating UI component changes during code reviews. |
| Playwright | Fast-growing end-to-end test framework by Microsoft, with built-in screenshot comparison and cross-browser automation for advanced UI scenarios. |
| TestCafe | Modern E2E testing framework for web apps, supports visual validation plugins, native JavaScript/TypeScript syntax, and multi-browser testing without Selenium. |
| Resemble.js | Lightweight image diffing library that can be paired with Puppeteer or Playwright for custom visual regression flows in self-managed environments. |
Let's dive in!
1. Katalon Platform
Katalon is a great choice if you're looking for a tool that does more than just visual testing. While Applitools is focused on spotting visual changes in your UI, Katalon gives you a full testing platform that handles UI testing, functional web testing, mobile testing, and even API testing, all in one place.
That means if you are looking for a comprehensive solution, Katalon's got you covered.
Key Features:
-
All-in-one IDE for multi-platform testing (web, mobile, API, desktop)
-
StudioAssist for guided scripting and test suggestions
-
Visual testing with image-based UI validation
-
Built-in support for BDD, data-driven testing, and test suite reuse
-
Seamless integration with Jira, CI/CD pipelines, TestOps, and test management tools
-
AI-powered TrueTest to identify and auto-generate critical user flows
-
Parallel test execution across browsers and devices
Pros:
-
Great balance of codeless and advanced scripting features
-
Wide protocol and platform coverage (including Windows desktop apps)
-
Intuitive UI makes onboarding faster for non-developers
-
Strong ecosystem with Katalon TestOps, analytics, and execution control
-
Active community and documentation support
Cons:
-
Limited customization compared to open-source frameworks
-
Desktop testing limited to Windows environments
-
Enterprise-tier features gated behind higher pricing plans
TrueTest is one of the most fascinating parts of Katalon Platform. It can analyze your production environment, pick out the most critical flows, and generate automated tests for it.
Pricing: Free tier available with limited features. Paid plans start at $84/user/month. Enterprise pricing is custom.
2. Percy (All-in-one visual testing platform)
Percy is a visual testing and review platform developed by BrowserStack. It captures UI snapshots across browsers and environments, then highlights visual changes with pixel‑based diffs—making it easy for teams to catch unintended UI regressions during development.
Key Features:
-
Automated screenshot capture on every code change, across browsers and responsive breakpoints.
-
Pixel‑accurate visual comparisons with clear, side‑by‑side diff views.
-
Git integration to run visual tests in pull requests with approval workflows.
-
Supports frameworks like Cypress, Playwright, Selenium, Storybook, and more.
-
Parallelized snapshot rendering on BrowserStack’s infrastructure.
Pros:
-
Seamlessly fits into CI/CD pipelines with minimal setup.
-
Works well for teams already using BrowserStack for cross‑browser testing.
-
PR‑based visual feedback improves collaboration between QA, devs, and designers.
-
Simple UI and clear visual diffs make regression review fast and accessible.
Cons:
-
Uses pixel comparison rather than AI, which can lead to false positives from minor rendering noise.
-
Lacks advanced visual intelligence or layout‑aware diffing like Applitools.
-
Not a full test automation tool—focused solely on visual testing.
Pricing:
Free plan with limited snapshots; paid tiers scale by usage, team size, and parallelism. Enterprise plans available through BrowserStack.
3. BackstopJS (Open-source visual regression testing for web applications)
BackstopJS is an open‑source visual regression testing framework built for modern web applications. It uses headless Chrome to capture screenshots and compare visual states over time, helping developers detect unintended UI changes automatically. If you want an open-source alternative to Applitools, Backstop JS is the choice.
Key Features:
-
Configurable scenarios for URL testing, viewport sizes, and user interactions.
-
Headless Chrome or Playwright engine for consistent, automated rendering.
-
CLI‑based workflow with JSON configuration and flexible command options.
-
Generates detailed HTML reports with side‑by‑side diffs and mismatch highlights.
-
Integrates with CI tools like Jenkins, GitHub Actions, and GitLab CI.
Pros:
-
Completely free and open source, suitable for custom pipelines.
-
High degree of configuration for visual baselines, thresholds, and viewport coverage.
-
Works well for pixel‑accurate visual validation in component libraries or static sites.
-
Easy to integrate with existing front‑end build workflows.
Cons:
-
Requires manual setup and scripting; no GUI or dashboard.
-
Uses pixel diffing instead of AI, so small rendering differences can trigger false positives.
-
Limited support for mobile and cross‑browser testing without extra setup.
-
Maintenance and scaling require developer expertise.
Pricing:
Free and open source under the MIT license. Infrastructure costs apply if hosted in CI/CD or cloud environments.
4. Loki
Loki is an open‑source visual regression testing framework tailored for component‑driven front‑end development (especially with Storybook).
Key features of Loki:
-
Designed for Storybook setups: capture screenshots of each story and compare to a baseline.
-
Support for headless Chrome runs (via Docker or local), translations across platforms (web, iOS simulators, Android emulators) through configuration.
-
Configurable diff‑engines (pixelmatch, GraphicsMagick, looks‑same) and viewport presets for different devices.
-
Easy CI integration with snapshot creation, test runs, approval of diffs.
Pros:
-
Free and open‑source under MIT licence (no vendor lock‑in).
-
Lightweight setup for component visual regression in Storybook workflows.
-
Minimal maintenance focus: designed to have low overhead.
-
Works across OS environments and in Docker, making CI usage straightforward
Cons:
-
Focused on Storybook/component‑level testing, less suited for full page flows or cross‑browser matrix out‑of‑the‑box.
-
Lacks sophisticated visual AI diffing (ignoring dynamic content, semantic layout changes) — uses pixel/engine diffing.
-
No built‑in collaborative dashboard or UI for review/approval like some commercial tools.
-
Requires proper baseline management (committing reference images, handling diffs) which can become labour‑intensive for large suites.
5. Screener
Screener is a visual regression testing platform built for front‑end teams who want to ensure visual consistency across components and applications. It captures screenshots of UI states and automatically compares them to previously approved baselines to detect visual changes during development.
Key Features:
-
Screenshot capture across multiple browsers and responsive viewports.
-
Storybook integration for component‑level visual testing.
-
Visual diffing with highlight overlays and DOM snapshot tools for easier debugging.
-
CLI and CI integration for test automation in pull requests and pipelines.
-
Team workflows for test approvals, baseline management, and collaboration.
Pros:
-
Good match for teams using Storybook and modern component libraries.
-
Fast setup for component‑level visual testing with clear visual diffs.
-
DOM snapshot feature helps reduce false positives by explaining root causes.
-
Supports multi‑browser testing without maintaining your own test grid.
Cons:
-
Relies on pixel‑based diffing, so it may trigger false positives from dynamic or minor rendering differences.
-
No AI‑based analysis or smart diffing like Applitools offers.
-
Less suited for full‑page or end‑to‑end UI flows without custom setup.
-
Pricing and parallel usage limits can be a concern for large pipelines or high test volume.
Pricing:
Commercial product with usage‑based pricing. Free trials are available, but scaling across teams or projects may require enterprise licensing. Pricing varies based on snapshot count, browser coverage, and concurrent runs.
6. Mabl
Mabl is a cloud‑native, AI‑powered test automation platform designed to cover web, mobile, API, accessibility and performance testing within a unified system.
Key Features:
-
Low‑code / codeless test creation for QA or business users, with JavaScript/Playwright/Appium extensibility for developers.
-
“Agentic AI” capabilities: auto‑healing of tests, visual change detection, natural‑language test creation and intelligent failure triage.
-
Unified test coverage (UI, mobile, API) running in parallel across browsers/devices with SaaS infrastructure.
-
Deep integrations with CI/CD, version control, Jira, Slack, local and headless runners, branching and snapshots for test versioning.
-
Cloud‑native scalability, no infrastructure to maintain, unlimited concurrency for test execution.
Pros:
-
Great for teams that want to reduce manual scripting and test maintenance thanks to AI‑driven automation.
-
Enables cross‑platform coverage (web + mobile + API) in one tool, avoiding tool‑sprawl.
-
Low‑barrier entry for non‑developers while still accommodating developers via code hooks.
-
Supports modern frameworks (Playwright, Appium) and integrates tightly into DevOps workflows.
Cons:
-
As a commercial SaaS product, cost may scale significantly with large volumes, parallelism or enterprise needs.
-
Although low‐code, teams still need to manage tests, baselines, and understand how their application behaves to get full value.
-
Because features are built around AI and automation, customization or on‑premises hosting may be more limited than open‐source alternatives.
Pricing:
Subscription‑based SaaS model; free trial period available. Costs vary based on team size, concurrency and module usage.
7. Testim
Testim is an AI‑augmented test automation platform designed to help teams create, manage, and scale web application tests with a mix of low‑code tools and JavaScript customization.
Key Features:
-
Visual test editor with record‑and‑playback for quick test creation, plus JavaScript for advanced logic.
-
Smart locators that adapt to UI changes using AI, reducing test breakage from minor DOM updates.
-
Reusable test components and step groups for modular, maintainable test design.
-
Parallel execution support across browsers, along with built‑in CI/CD integration.
-
Test management features like versioning, branching, debugging tools, and team collaboration workflows.
Pros:
-
Designed for both QA engineers and developers—low‑code for speed, code access for flexibility.
-
AI‑based element handling improves test stability and reduces maintenance.
-
Component reuse and parameterization promote DRY, scalable test suites.
-
Easy onboarding with intuitive UI and strong support for modern web apps.
Cons:
-
Pricing can become expensive as usage, team size, and concurrency increase.
-
Some edge cases in highly dynamic or custom UIs may still require manual fixes.
-
Primarily web‑focused. Mobile support and end‑to‑end test complexity are more limited.
-
Visual validation is basic—no semantic diffing or layout intelligence like Applitools.
Pricing:
Free and team‑tier plans are available with basic limits. Advanced features, concurrency scaling, and enterprise support require custom pricing.
8. Ghost Inspector
Ghost Inspector is a browser-based test automation tool built for simple, no-code web testing. It allows test recording directly from a Chrome extension and provides scheduling, monitoring, and reporting out-of-the-box.
Key Features:
-
Chrome extension for visual test recording
-
Scheduled test runs and alerting
-
Video playback and screenshots of test failures
-
Cross-browser and mobile emulation
-
Slack, GitHub, and Jenkins integrations
Pros:
-
Very quick setup and user-friendly for non-technical teams
-
Excellent for regression testing and uptime monitoring
-
Built-in monitoring ensures app health without manual testing
-
Mobile emulation adds extra flexibility
Cons:
-
Limited logic customization, branching and loops are basic
-
Web-only; no native support for mobile apps or desktop apps
-
Reporting features less robust than enterprise-level competitors
Pricing:
Free tier available (with limited frequency). Paid plans start at $109/month and include additional integrations and analytics.
9. Chromatic
Chromatic is a cloud‑based visual testing and review platform tailored for component‑driven UIs (especially when using Storybook). Made by the Storybook team, it focuses on capturing and managing visual snapshots of UI states, enabling teams to catch layout, style and rendering changes early.
Key Features:
-
Automated screenshot capture of component stories (via Storybook) across browsers and viewports.
-
Visual diffing (1‑up, 2‑up, diff overlays) to highlight any rendering changes.
-
Ignore‑regions and configuration to exclude dynamic or non‑relevant UI areas.
-
Built‑in review workflow: you can see changes, comment, approve or reject snapshots in a UI, assign reviewers (designers, product, dev).
-
CI/CD integration with GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket, etc. Pull requests can be automatically annotated with visual tests status.
-
Component cataloging: track component usage, versions, history, and link design specs (via Figma integrations etc).
-
Accessibility & interaction test support: beyond visuals, Chromatic offers checks for UI interactions and accessibility issues as part of the same workflow.
Pros:
-
Excellent for teams building UI component libraries or design systems — it integrates seamlessly with Storybook.
-
Easy to get up and running: minimal setup required when you already use Storybook.
-
Good collaboration features: designers and non‑developers can review visual changes without needing full code knowledge.
-
Helps prevent UI regressions and design drift by making visual reviews part of your development process.
Cons:
-
Best suited for component‑level UI work; less geared toward full end‑to‑end flows, large pages, or backend‑heavy visual paths.
-
Charges are based on snapshot counts, browsers/viewports, and builds — costs can scale as your component library grows.
-
Since it snapshots what you explicitly capture (stories), un‑captured states or page flows may go untested.
-
While very strong in visuals for components, it doesn't replace full functional or API test coverage on its own.
Pricing:
Free plan is available with limited snapshot quota; paid tiers increase snapshot limits, browsers/viewports tested, and enterprise features (customization, concurrency, SSO) are available.
10. TestCafe
TestCafe is an open-source Node.js testing framework designed for modern web applications. It supports end-to-end browser testing using JavaScript or TypeScript, and runs tests without relying on browser plugins.
Key Features:
-
JavaScript/TypeScript test authoring
-
Cross-browser and headless mode support
-
Parallel execution and remote testing
-
Built-in waits and selector mechanisms
-
CI/CD and test report integrations
Pros:
-
Lightweight and easy to integrate with Node.js projects
-
No need for WebDriver or external browser plugins
-
Great developer experience with VSCode or any JS IDE
-
Active open-source community and plugin ecosystem
Cons:
-
Requires scripting knowledge, which means it's less friendly for no-code users
-
Limited support for mobile or native apps
-
Visual testing requires external plugins or tools
Pricing:
Open-source and free. Commercial wrappers and CI services may incur costs.
11. Playwright
Playwright is a fast, open‑source test automation framework built by Microsoft that supports visual testing through screenshot comparison. While it doesn’t offer AI‑powered layout analysis like Applitools, it’s a powerful alternative for teams that want to integrate functional and visual checks into a single test suite.
Key Features:
-
Built‑in commands for capturing and comparing screenshots like toHaveScreenshot() or toMatchSnapshot().
-
Cross‑browser testing with Chromium, Firefox, and WebKit.
-
Control over image diff thresholds, snapshot naming, and viewport sizes.
-
Integration with Playwright Test Runner and native support for CI/CD pipelines.
-
Headless or full browser rendering for consistent baseline comparisons.
Pros:
-
Fully open source with no license fees, making it budget‑friendly for teams of any size.
-
Unified testing approach, with functional and visual assertions in one framework.
-
Flexible and scriptable, perfect for engineering‑heavy teams or dev‑focused QA.
-
Strong developer ecosystem and rapid feature development.
Cons:
-
Screenshot comparisons rely on pixel diffing, which can lead to false positives for small rendering differences.
-
No built‑in visual dashboard or baseline approval UI. It requires manual snapshot review or external tooling.
-
Lacks AI features to detect meaningful visual changes or ignore dynamic content.
-
Requires more setup and discipline to manage snapshot versions across branches or environments.
Why Use Playwright Instead of Applitools?
If you're already using Playwright for end‑to‑end automation and want to add basic visual regression testing without adding another platform, it’s a smart and efficient choice. It offers tight integration, full code control, and low overhead. However, if your primary focus is scaling visual testing across multiple environments with minimal false positives and intelligent analysis, Applitools still leads with its AI and visual test management capabilities. Playwright is best when you want full ownership and are okay managing visual diffs manually.
12. Resemble.js
|
